TheSun 17Dec2005
Police force deserves better
"... the worst thing of all is to have an irresponsible police force, and the next worst is to have one that is responsible only to the executive..." Lord Devlin, 1957.
THE COUNTRY WAS still digesting the Royal Commission Report on enhancing the operation and management of the Royal Malaysian Police (RMP) when the ear-squat pictures were revealed last month.
I share the view of Tan Sri Musa Hitam, our former deputy prime minister cum home minister, that the public response to it had been overblown the government's response to the pictures, the appointment of yet another commission, a visit to China by the home minister and apologies galore.
Looks to me like knee jerk responses to the media build-up and as many commentators noted, a recognition of the vast influence of the New China. Lots of tourists, students and investment income to be lost during this slow growth economy.
Let us view the squat pictures with some perspective. Taken at its worst, the pictures do not display torture or physical harm. Breaches of lock-up and body search rules are another matter. There had been far more serious transgressions which deserve public and gove nment attention. The deaths and injuries alleged in lock-ups, the shooting of a van in Pengkalan Kubor involving innocents sometime back, the loss of crucial drug evidence to be used in court, the escape of powerful criminals from detention all these issues deserve greater attention.
One of the benefits of studying at the University of Buckingham two decades back was the exposure to police officers, both serving officers and those that had left the force.
I g athered from my interactions that police work is indeed hard and stressful. Officers are subject to frequent relocations and 24-hour calls. The stressful nature of the work frequently resulted in family break-ups and health problems.
Work procedures are ridden with rules and regulations and with much paperwork. Then there is the constant danger to life and limb for officers handling violent crimes and other dangerous duties.
While focusing on weaknesses in the police force one must not forget the sacrifices put up by the officers and men as well as the constraints they have to face in their daily tasks.
The police need the active cooperation and support of the public in carrying out its duties. Let not the undergoing negative publicity deter the public from providing the necessary support and encouragement.
The Royal Commission Report on the whole had been well received by the nation.
Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's readiness to set up the commission speaks well of his administration. We have to reco gnise and to face up to weaknesses. Of course one must not believe that problems only exist in the RMP.
Similar critical examinations of other organisations such as the military, immigration, local councils, Economic Planning Unit and more would also reveal surprising, even shocking results. If one calls for complaints, one will get loads.
The Royal Commission, given the time available to it, had attempted to familiarise itself with the current state of policing and had confronted head-on sensitive issues such as corruption in the force. The public were allowed to air their numerous grievances.
Owing no doubt to its terms of reference, the report is somewhat lacking in several areas.
First, there is little by way of assessing the demand for policing, both current and in the future.
In my article, "Policing in the 21st Century" (The Edge Dec 23, 2002), I noted that, "Rapid changes in the socio-economy, notably urbanisation and excessive population growth have resulted in increased problems for the police".
Factors resulting in greater demands on policing include illegal immigration, dislocation of estate labour, urban unemploy ment, increase in number of vehicles, access to mobile phones and g reater availability of firearms.
Second, the inadequate resources made available for policing. In my article I gave the example of police patrols.
"There is just not enough police patrolling done, particularly during the wee hours. The deputy IGP had pointed out that financial allocations for police vehicles are just not sufficient ...
"The civilian population is laden with the latest sports utility vehicles and luxurious four-wheel drives while the police force has to make do with Land Rovers that have seen better days".
And of course the most important resource is manpower. My comment here, "Sad to say, gone are the days when head prefects, house captains and top athletes at our premier schools were the prime candidates for the nation's police force. We must do more to ensure that our police force attracts the country's cream of the crop".
Third, management concepts and strategies. The RMP, from its inception more than a century ago had been expanding and expanding.
Arising from our history, principally the Emergency (194860), continuing communist insurrection till late 80's and the May 1969 riots, para-military and anti-terrorism responsibilities had been assigned to the RMP.
Its centralised management structure had continued to this day. Contrast this with the separate constabularies of Great Britain and the separate state, county and city police forces in the United States.
We do need to review the management structure to deter mine if cer tain RMP functions could be better placed under other agencies, to consider the for mation of regional contingents to take up certain Bukit Aman functions and so on.
Fourth, supervision of the police. There is nothing unusual or untoward in seeking better supervision of the police.
Public listed companies have exter nal auditors, audit committees of the board, general meetings of shareholders and the purview of regulators (Companies Commission, Securities Commission and Bursa Malaysia).
The police have enormous powers which are exercised by men and these powers and men need to be closely supervised.
There is nothing I hate more than to see two policemen on a motorcycle stopping a "foreign worker-looking" man in a back lane. Apart from the unhealthy image it conveys, it reflects poor supervision. The policemen are not being supervised by any officer and would appear to be on a frolic of their own.
Like it or not, the key word in policing is proper supervision the constables by junior officers, juniors by seniors, right up to the top.
Who supervises the top police officers? The answer is the Home Ministry and the Police Force Commission.
The Federal Constitution Article 140 provides, "There shall be a Police Force Commission whose jurisdiction shall extend to all persons who are members of the police force and ... shall be responsible for the appointment, confirmation ... promotion, transfer and exercise of disciplinary control ..."
The Article also provides for the Police Force Commission to delegate its duties, to consult outside persons to carry out other matters it considers necessary or expedient to better perform its functions.
Through all the recent travails faced by RMP, it is surprising that we have not heard more from or about the Police Force Commission.
This commission is the body primarily responsible, under the Constitution, to supervise the police force. The supervision is not only by way of selection/ promotion/emplacement but also the exercise of disciplinary control.
The Royal Commission Report did not address the issue of the function of the Police Force Commission. Perhaps the Police Force Commission staffing and resources can be suitably expan-ded so that we do not need to set up separate bodies to hear police complaints or ad hoc commissions every time there is a major public uproar.
Fifth, addressing the future. The Royal Commission, in line with its terms of reference, did not directly tackle this area. However it did look at modernisation aspects which are relevant here. Here are some "future" issues which the authorities should look at.
· I have mentioned how urbanisation, illegal immigration, motor vehicle "explosion", etc had affected the demand for policing. This trend is likely to continue. The police would not only need additional resources but would also have to change their policing and investigation methods.
· Related to the above is the growth of urban conurbations outside the Klang Valley. From newspaper and anecdotal reports, crime rates in fast-growing areas such as Penang and Johor Baru are worrying.
Existing policing resources and organisational set-ups for large urban centres should be reviewed.
· Rise of organised crime. As a country gets richer and more urbanised, the scourge of organised crime appears.
Syndicates prosper from the rise of drug trafficking, illegal bookmaking, prostitution and extortion.
Organised crime must be clearly distinguished from crimes like purse-snatching and burglaries. In some less fortunate countries, crime overlords even take over towns and small states.
We need American-style racketeering, postal fraud (including wire, wireless and electronic communication) and money laundering statutes and enforcement.
RMP would need to gear itself organisationally and resourcewise to tackle organised crime. Left untended organised crime can even take over the police and government itself.
· Surveillance equipment. It is shocking when a jewellery shop located deep within a major shopping mall could be robbed and we had no closed-circuit photos of the perpetrators. And motorists entering and leaving the toll highways are not photo-recorded as in most countries.
No wonder criminals are able to travel far and wide undetected. And market areas like Section 14, Petaling Jaya; and Jalan Chow Kit, Kuala Lumpur; should certainly be under camera surveillance.
The authorities, in particular RMP, and the private sector should work together on electronic surveillance to cut down waste and promote effectiveness.
· Self-help security services. Companies and organisations having property and people to protect should be encouraged to provide more of their own resources for protection purposes.
Such private guards, vehicles and surveillance equipment can help reduce the taxpayer burden. RMP should ensure private guards are vetted and supervised.
While I support more self-help efforts, I am not in favour of g ated communities. The authorities should study this issue carefully in relation to the country's image and its effect on race-relations.
Malaysians, under the present administration, are justifiably enjoying their greater opportunity to expose and to criticise wrongdoings. Although most government bodies are also ridden with weaknesses, to a large extent RMP had taken the brunt because its involvement with the public is so great.
In my view, exposes and criticisms are fine. But issues have to be seen in their proper perspective. We, the present Malaysian public, owe a great deal to the police force for its courage and sacrifices during the Emergency, Confrontation and public disorders.
Do not paint with too broad a brush. Weaknesses in the force are not only due to internal factors but are also the result of lack of resources and policy failures on the part of the government.
The police force is imbued with super-enormous powers. For this reason it, from top to bottom, has to be properly supervised and be made accountable.
This is the major issue which we must all address. At the same time we must be mindful of the new, difficult challenges of policing work in the future.
Finally, let us consider another thought from Lord Devlin, " ... policemen are not by origin or by training simply creatures of the executive. They are not men in barracks but citizens living and working among the communities they serve". Radzuan Halim, a former banker, teaches MBA and law students.